Brian's Capsule Reviews

Short reviews of films

Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps (2010)

IMDb Listing
I’ve never considered Wall Street to be one of my favorite Oliver Stone films, but this sequel, for the first hour or so of its running time, is one of the best movies of the year. Stone’s obviously working in an area that he knows something about – the original film was dedicated to his father, who was a stockbroker – and his critique of today’s financial system is harsh and effective. Surprisingly, during these sections of the film, Gordon Gekko (the iconic character from the first film, played again by Michael Douglas) is mostly relegated to the sidelines, surfacing mostly to serve as a sort of Greek chorus, filling the audience in on how things work and why they’re so corrupt. Unfortunately, the movie flatlines over the second half, as Gekko returns to the forefront, and it becomes clear that the filmmakers can’t make sense of their ambivalence towards the Gekko character. Hence, he becomes both ruthlessly villainous while at the same time, just a flawed old guy who wants to be a better dad to his grown daughter (Carey Mulligan, giving some dimension to the kind of underdeveloped female character common in Stone’s films) and future son-in-law (Shia LeBeouf). My lasting impression was that of disappointment, since Stone had half of a great movie here, with a career-best performance from LeBeouf and terrific supporting turns by Josh Brolin and Frank Langella. 6/10

October 8, 2010 - Posted by | Stone, Oliver

4 Comments »

  1. I think I’d give the film the same score, but for diametrically opposite reasons.

    I thought the first hour was a slog, with a simplified yet confused explanation for the financial crisis that misses its mark. I like LaBeouf but I didn’t believe him as a broker, while I fully believed Mulligan. There wasn’t enough of Gekko, I wanted to know more about his time pre-prison, but the film started to pick up once he got back into the plot (although the twist was predictable).

    Do agree that the ending was a bit of a mess because it couldn’t come to terms with whether Gekko was a good or bad guy.

    Filmed looked good and the actors were in general good, like Brolin and Langella, even if their characters were underdeveloped.

    Comment by Nick | October 8, 2010 | Reply

  2. I’ve already posted my comments on GE so won’t replicate them here, suffice to say that I’m agreeance with Brian more than Nick. First half (even the first two-thirds) was very strong but it badly lost its way in the last 30 mins or so, for reasons described above.

    Speaking of the cast, Sarandon’s role was barely more than a cameo – seemed a strangely small role for someone of her stature to take. Perhaps her role was cut down in post-production.

    And as I said on GE, Sheen was awful in his cameo – seemed to be playing Charlie Harper instead of Bud Fox.

    Comment by Marco Trevisiol | October 12, 2010 | Reply

  3. Spoke with a friend who works for a brokerage firm. He said I was nuts to like that piece of fluff. Said it reminded him of Jim Carrey’s A Christmas Carol more than the original.

    Comment by Nick | October 12, 2010 | Reply

  4. I saw the original Wall Street the other day in anticipation for seeing this. It was solid but overrated – too clunky and obvious to be a complete success. And it’s closing scenes barely had any more realism than this did.

    Comment by Marco Trevisiol | October 12, 2010 | Reply


Leave a comment